Back

Resources

Scholarly Resources

The research that institutions cite but do not follow.

Psychology and sociology understand coercive control and institutional betrayal well. Courts and institutions act as though they do not. These references are the foundation of that knowledge. They are cited in clinical training, legal scholarship, and policy documents, then routinely ignored in practice.

Loading references…

Loading references…

Loading references…

Loading references…

Loading references…

Loading references…

Loading references…

Loading references…

This is a working bibliography — selective, not exhaustive. It reflects the literature I return to most often in my research and advocacy work, and the sources I recommend most frequently to clients, collaborators, and people trying to understand what happened to them.

Entries are linked to their DOI or original source where available. If you encounter a reference that is paywalled and cannot access it, feel free to reach out — I can often point you to an open-access version or author-posted preprint.

A clear next step

Have a project in mind?

Tell me what your business is working on and where you need support. I’ll follow up within 72 hours.

Start a conversation

Not legal or mental-health advice. For professional advice, please consult a licensed attorney or mental-health professional.